Let's start with a question: Who owns Linux?

Not legally—we know it's open source under GPL. But economically, who captures the value Linux creates?

Red Hat (acquired by IBM for $34 billion)
Amazon (AWS runs on Linux, $80+ billion annual revenue)
Google (Android is Linux, powers 2.5 billion devices)
Microsoft (Azure runs mostly Linux, $50+ billion annual revenue)

And Linus Torvalds? He gets a salary from the Linux Foundation. A good salary, sure. But nothing close to the trillions of dollars in value his work enabled.

This is the open source paradox, and it's getting worse.

The Value Extraction Machine

Open source software underpins the modern internet. The NPM registry has over 2 million packages. GitHub hosts 330 million repositories. The vast majority are freely available to anyone.

These projects create enormous value:

React powers billions of dollars in e-commerce
Node.js runs countless startups and enterprises
Python drives the AI revolution
Kubernetes orchestrates the cloud

But the developers who maintain these projects? Many do it for free, on weekends, in their spare time after their day jobs.

Meanwhile, the companies that use this code raise billions in venture capital.

The Donation Model Failed

GitHub Sponsors launched in 2019 with the promise of sustainable open source funding. Five years later, most projects make less than $100/month in sponsorships.

Patreon, Buy Me a Coffee, Open Collective—these platforms help, but they're bandaids on a broken model.

Why donations don't work:

No upside alignment - If your library becomes the industry standard, donors don't benefit
Irregular income - Donations are unpredictable and unreliable
Moral hazard - Companies use the code but don't feel obligated to pay
Scale problem - More users = more work, but not more donations

The fundamental issue is that open source creates value, but captures none of it.

What If Developers Had Equity?

Imagine a different model:

You build an open source project
You tokenize it, creating 1 million tokens
You keep 50%, sell 50% to early supporters
As your project grows, token value increases
Everyone who contributed early gets rewarded

This isn't theoretical. This is how every successful company works.

When Facebook was starting, early employees got equity. When their hard work made Facebook valuable, their equity became valuable.

Why should open source be any different?

The Case for Tokenized Repositories

Repository tokenization isn't about putting code behind paywalls. The code stays open. The license stays the same.

What changes is ownership.

Instead of maintainers working for free while others profit, tokens create a mechanism for value capture:

Developers get compensated proportionally to adoption
Early supporters (individuals or companies) benefit from growth
Communities can govern project direction through token votes
Companies align incentives by buying tokens instead of vague "sponsorships"

It's not about restricting access. It's about rewarding creation.

How This Changes Everything

For Individual Developers - You're not begging for Patreon donations. You're raising capital from supporters who believe in your work. As your project grows, so does your net worth.

For Companies - Instead of "taking" open source for free and feeling vaguely guilty, you buy tokens. Your developers depend on this library? Buy tokens. Support the project and align incentives.

For Investors - You can't invest in open source today. With tokenization, you can. Find promising projects early, support them, and benefit if they succeed.

For the Ecosystem - Better incentives = better software. When maintainers can work full-time on projects people actually use, everyone wins.

The Objections

"But open source should be free!"

It still is. The code is open. The license doesn't change. Tokenization just adds a financial layer on top.

"This will create inequality!"

Open source already has inequality. Popular maintainers get job offers and conference speaking fees. Unknown maintainers burn out in obscurity. Tokenization makes the value transparent instead of hidden.

"What if people just fork it?"

They can. That's the beauty of open source. But the original has the brand, the community, and the token holders. Forks rarely succeed unless the original project is abandoned.

"This is just crypto speculation!"

No. This is recognizing that code has value and creators should capture some of it. The blockchain is just the technology that makes it possible.

Why BSV? Why Now?

We're building this on Bitcoin SV because it's the only blockchain where the economics actually work:

Sub-cent fees mean tokenization is affordable
Instant finality means transactions settle immediately
Unlimited capacity means it scales as adoption grows

Other chains charge $50+ to mint a token. That's a non-starter for open source projects.

BSV makes tokenization accessible to every developer, not just well-funded projects.

What This Looks Like in Practice

Today: You maintain a popular JavaScript library

10,000 GitHub stars
Used by Fortune 500 companies
50+ hours per month maintaining it
Income: $143/month in GitHub Sponsors

Tomorrow: You tokenize that library

Mint 1 million tokens
Keep 60% (600,000 tokens)
Sell 40% at $0.01/token = $4,000 raised
As adoption grows, token value increases
Companies buy tokens instead of vague sponsorships
You can finally work on it full-time

The code is still free. The license is still open. But now you're compensated for your work.

The Future We're Building

b0ase.com is building the infrastructure for this future:

GitHub integration to verify ownership
Token minting on BSV for low-cost deployment
Marketplace where tokens are traded
Developer APIs so others can build on this

We're starting with GitHub repositories, but this model works for:

NPM packages
Docker images
AI models
Datasets
APIs
Any digital asset with measurable value

The Question Isn't "If"—It's "When"

Value will flow to creators eventually. History proves it.

Musicians were starving until Spotify and streaming royalties
Writers were unpaid until Substack and creator monetization
Content creators were hobbyists until YouTube Partner Program

Developers are next.

The infrastructure exists. The blockchain can handle it. The economic model makes sense.

All that's missing is adoption.

Join the Movement

If you've built something valuable, stop giving it away for free.

If you're a company using open source, stop taking without giving back.

If you're an investor, stop ignoring the people who build the tools you depend on.

Developers deserve equity in what they build.

It's time to make that happen.

Ready to tokenize your repository? Visit b0ase.com to get started.

Want to discuss this? Email us at richard@b0ase.com or find us on Twitter @b0ase_com.

Building something in this space? We're open to partnerships and collaboration. Let's talk.

Intent

[Describe the goal of this post for all three audiences: Human clarity, Search indexability, and AI intent extraction.]

Core Thesis

[Provide a single-sentence core thesis for the post.]

Summary for AI Readers

Key takeaway one
Key takeaway two

Get Started

Book a free consultation: Contact us See our work: Portfolio

Questions? Email us at richard@b0ase.com or message us on Telegram.

b0ase.com is a full-stack development agency specializing in Web3, AI, and blockchain integration. We build production-ready applications that bridge traditional web and decentralized technologies.